Re: [PERFORM] Why do I need more time with partition table?

2012-07-25 Thread Jan Otto
hi al, On Jul 25, 2012, at 10:40 AM, AI Rumman wrote: > Thanks. I missed to add the trigger. > Now I added it, but still without partition taking less time compared to with > partition query. > > With partition :- > > explain analyze > select * > from table1 as c > inner join table2 as a o

Re: [PERFORM] Why do I need more time with partition table?

2012-07-24 Thread Jan Otto
hi al, > With Parition :- > > > explain analyze > select * > from table1 as c > inner join table2 as a on c.crmid = a.table2id and deleted = 0 > where module ='Leads'; > > QUERY PLAN

Re: [PERFORM] Repeat execution of stable expressions

2012-03-06 Thread Jan Otto
hi, > I've complained many times that > select (f()).*; > > will execute f() once for each returned field of f() since the server > essentially expands that into: > > select f().a, f().b; > > try it yourself, see: > create function f(a out text, b out text) returns record as $$ > begin > perfo

Re: [PERFORM] The state of PG replication in 2008/Q2?

2008-08-22 Thread Jan Otto
Hi Mathias, On Aug 22, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Mathias Stjernström wrote: I Agree with Robert but i never heard of Cybercluster before. Does anyone have any experience with Cybercluster? It sounds really interesting! Some months ago i took a look into cybercluster. At that point cybercluster wa