Thanks Claus thats good news!
I'm having a reputable vendor build the box and test it for me before
delivering. The bottom line of your message, did you mean 'should be not a
problem'? I wonder what the main reason for your improvement, your ram was
increased by a factor of 2, but 4 way opteron
I am about to pull the trigger on a new machine after analyzing some
discussions I posted here last year. I've been trying to spec out a reliable
and powerfull enough machine where I won't have to replace it for some time.
Currently I've been using a dual Xeon 3.06ghz with 4GB of ram and utilizing
g yet, as far as I know, while they
> normally offer several SCSI and/or FC-enclosures.
> There are also some third-party enclosures (adaptec and promise for
> instance) available of course.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arjen
>
> On 18-8-2006 21:07, Kenji Morishige wrote:
>
ill be able to have two top-off-the-line x86 cpu's (amd
> opteron 285 or intel woorcrest 5160) and 16GB of memory (even FB Dimm,
> which is pretty expensive).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arjen van der Meijden
>
>
> On 8-8-2006 22:43, Kenji Morishige wrote:
> >I
Regarding the DL585 etc boxes from HP, they seem to require external JBOD or
SCSI/SAS enclosures. Does anyone have any particular preference on how these
units should be configured or speced? I'm guessing I'll use the onboard SCSI
RAID 1 with the onboard drives for the OS, but will need 2 externa
x27;s (amd
> opteron 285 or intel woorcrest 5160) and 16GB of memory (even FB Dimm,
> which is pretty expensive).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arjen van der Meijden
>
>
> On 8-8-2006 22:43, Kenji Morishige wrote:
> >I've asked for some help here a few months ago
Great info, which vendor were you looking at for these Opterons? I am goign
to be purchasing 2 of these. :) I do need 24/7 reliability.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:08:29PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 15:43, Kenji Morishige wrote:
> > I've asked for some h
The 1+0 on the WAL is better than on PGDATA? I guess I'm confused about the
write sequence of the data. I will research more, thank you!
-Kenji
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:59:09PM -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>I am considering a set
I've asked for some help here a few months ago and got some really helpfull
answers regarding RAID controllers and server configuration. Up until
recently I've been running PostgreSQL on a two year old Dual Xeon 3.06Ghz
machine with a single channel RAID controller (previously Adaptec 2200S, but
n
Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:52:09PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Kenji Morishige wrote:
> >I am currently running FreeBSD 4.11 (due to IT requirements for now) and
> >Adaptec's 2200S RAID controller running in RAID5. I was advised in the
> >past
> >that the 220
I am currently running FreeBSD 4.11 (due to IT requirements for now) and
Adaptec's 2200S RAID controller running in RAID5. I was advised in the past
that the 2200S is actually a poor performing controller and obviously the
RAID5 is less than ideal for databases. I chose to run the controller in
R
Where can I find any documentation to partition the tablespace disk files onto
different physical arrays for improved performance?
-Kenji
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/d
wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Kenji Morishige wrote:
> >> I've been stumped as to how to call psql from the command line without it
> >> prompting me for a password. Is there a enviornoment variable I can
> >> specify for
>
Sweet! Thanks.
-Kenji
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 03:03:54PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Kenji Morishige wrote:
> > I've been stumped as to how to call psql from the command line without it
> > prompting me for a password. Is there a enviornoment variable I can specify
>
ll psql -c without it prompting
me. Is it possible?
-Kenji
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:39:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kenji Morishige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Various users run a tool that updates this table to determine if the
> > particular
> > resource is availa
I am using postgresql to be the central database for a variety of tools for
our testing infrastructure. We have web tools and CLI tools that require access
to machine configuration and other states for automation. We have one tool that
uses a table that looks like this:
systest_live=# \d cuty
Thanks guys, I'm studying each of your responses and am going to start to
experiement. Unfortunately, I don't have another box with similar specs to
do a perfect experiment with, but I think I'm going to go ahead and open a
service window to ungrade the box to FBSD6.0 and apply some other changes
About a year ago we decided to migrate our central database that powers various
intranet tools from MySQL to PostgreSQL. We have about 130 tables and about
10GB of data that stores various status information for a variety of services
for our intranet. We generally have somewhere between 150-200 co
18 matches
Mail list logo
