Re: [PERFORM] Optimising a query

2007-12-19 Thread Paul Lambert
Gregory Stark wrote: "Richard Huxton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul Lambert wrote: " -> Sort (cost=30197.98..30714.85 rows=206748 width=16) (actual >> time=5949.691..7018.931 rows=206748 loops=1)" "Sort Key: dealer_id, year_id, subled

Re: [PERFORM] Optimising a query

2007-12-18 Thread Paul Lambert
Paul Lambert wrote: This part of the query alone takes a significant part of the time: SELECT DISTINCT ON (finbalance.dealer_id, finbalance.year_id, finbalance.subledger_id, finbalance.account_id) finbalance.year_id AS year

[PERFORM] Optimising a query

2007-12-18 Thread Paul Lambert
'0'::text)))::integer))" " -> Index Scan using pk_fincompany_dealer_company on fincompany (cost=0.01..8.28 rows=1 width=61) (actual time=0.007..0.009 rows=1 loops=17227)" "Index Cond: (((fincompany.dealer

Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL

2007-10-31 Thread Paul Lambert
minute when they find a cheaper system. -- Paul Lambert Database Administrator AutoLedgers ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org