11'::"bit")
=
B'1'::"bit")
Rows Removed by Filter: 1191
Total runtime: 9359.593 ms
(4 rows)
*Time: 9360.072 ms*
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Imig wro
Hey all,
Lots of interesting suggestions! I'm loving it.
Just came back to this a bit earlier today and made a sample table to see
what non-index performance would be. Constructed data just like above (used
12M rows and 80% true for all 100 boolean columns)
Here's an analyze for what I'd expect
Hey all,
New to the lists so please let me know if this isn't the right place for
this question.
I am trying to understand how to structure a table to allow for optimal
performance on retrieval. The data will not change frequently so you can
basically think of it as static and only concerned abou
