Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-15 Thread Samba GUEYE
Alright thanks all of you for your answers, but i've got 3 more questions : 1. Why ... partitionning is not a good idea ... like you said Robert and Conor ... I grant that it would be better to never need to do that ? 2. Is there another way or strategy to deal with very large

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-15 Thread Samba GUEYE
to workaround the inheritance foreigh key issue but i will at least test it because we have limited resources and can't afford to have many servers or whatever to boost performances... Best Regards Le 15/03/2011 14:18, Shaun Thomas a écrit : On 03/15/2011 05:10 AM, Samba GUEYE wrote: 1. Why

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-14 Thread Samba GUEYE
Yeah but is there a workaround to force the root table to propagate the foreign key to the partitionned table because right now all foreign keys to partitionned table throws constraints violation and it's a big problem for me Le 11/03/2011 19:31, Robert Haas a écrit : On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-10 Thread Samba GUEYE
, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Samba GUEYE wrote: I have a problem with table partitioning because i have a foreign key applied on the partionned table and it throw a constraint violation error during inserts. I saw on the manual (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/ddl-inherit.html caveats

[PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-08 Thread Samba GUEYE
Hello, I have a problem with table partitioning because i have a foreign key applied on the partionned table and it throw a constraint violation error during inserts. I saw on the manual (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/ddl-inherit.html caveats section) that it's a limitation