I wrote:
> That's it. A very simple problem.
It was hinted to me off-list that my mail was fanning the flames, so
to clarify: when I say things like the above, I mean conceptually.
I think there might be a shared pool of knowledge that says it's
anything but simple in practical terms, but that h
On 12/20/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:47:53 -0800
> "Trevor Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This "feature" as it is called can be developed externally and has
> > > zero reason to exist wit
On 12/20/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roberts, Jon wrote:
> > This really is a needed feature to make PostgreSQL more attractive to
> > businesses. A more robust security model that better follows commercial
> > products is needed for adoption.
> I would argue that commercial
On 12/18/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:05:46 -0600
> "Roberts, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we are talking about enhancement requests, I would propose we
> > create a role that can be granted/revoked that enables a user to see
> > dictionary obj
On 11/29/07, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:48 +0100, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> >> In fact an even more useful option would be to ask the planner to throw
> >> error if the expected cost exceeds a certain threshold...
>
On 11/13/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> > Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > > I'm not a private support organisation; please send your replies to the
> > > list, not me.
> >
> > Sorry. Most of the lists I send to have ReplyTo set, but a few do not.
> > And then I
On 9/5/07, Thomas Finneid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how does pg utilise multi cpus/cores, i.e. does it use more than one
> core? and possibly, how, are there any documentation about this.
PostgreSQL creates a new process to handle each connection to the
database. Multiple sessions can therefo
On 9/5/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Trevor Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/5/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Right,
On 9/5/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc
> > > array.
> >
> > Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk
> > subsystem becau
On 8/9/07, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:04:09PM +0530, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >keep an eye for the HOT feature which will hopefully make 8.3 that
> >will highly reduce the penalty for (small) updates in many cases.
>
> Is there an overview somewhere about h
10 matches
Mail list logo
