On Mar 17, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I like their approach...ddr ram + raid sanity backup + super reliable
power system. Their prices are on jupiter (and i dont mean jupiter,
fl) but hopefully there will be some competition and the invetible
Nothing unique to them. I have a 4
On Mar 17, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Open Source SSD via iSCSI with commodity hardware... hmmm. sounds
like
a useful project.
sh! don't give away our top secret plans!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is
I like their approach...ddr ram + raid sanity backup + super reliable
power system. Their prices are on jupiter (and i dont mean jupiter,
fl) but hopefully there will be some competition and the invetible
Nothing unique to them. I have a 4 year old SSD from a now out-of-
business
Josh,
On 3/16/06 9:43 PM, Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com wrote:
With a single 3 Gbyte/second infiniband connection to the device?
Hey, take it easy! Jim's post was tongue-in-cheek.
You're right - I insulted his bandwidth, sorry :-)
- Luke
---(end of
For God's sake buy a mainframe! =o)
On 3/17/06, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:44:25PM -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
You'd be better off with 4 x $10K servers that do 800MB/s from disk each and
a Bizgres MPP - then you'd do 3.2GB/s (faster than the SSD) at a
We got a quote for one of these (entirely for comedy value of course)
and it was in the region of £1,500,000 give or take a few thousand.
On 16 Mar 2006, at 18:33, Jim Nasby wrote:
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution!
On 3/16/06, Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
products/tera-ramsan/
Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :)
I like their approach...ddr
On 3/17/06, Rodrigo Madera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about you databasers that crunch in some selects, updates
and deletes, but my personal developer workstation is planned to be a
4x 300GB SATA300 with a dedicated RAID stripping controller (no
checksums, just speedup) and 4x AMD64
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:44:25PM -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Jim,
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
products/tera-ramsan/
With a single 3 Gbyte/second infiniband connection to the device?
Jim,
On 3/17/06 9:36 AM, Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now what happens as soon as you start doing random I/O? :)
Well - given that we've divided the data into 32 separate segments, and that
seeking is done in parallel over all 256 disk drives, random I/O rocks hard
and scales. Of
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:28, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 3/17/06, Luke Lonergan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now what happens as soon as you start doing random I/O? :)
If you are accessing 3 rows at a time from among billions, the problem you
have is mostly access time - so an SSD might be very
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
products/tera-ramsan/
Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive
Jim Nasby wrote:
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution!
http://www.superssd.com/products/tera-ramsan/
Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :)
And give us one :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering
.
(...and as the example shows, perhaps more money than sense.)
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mar 16, 2006 1:33 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] 1 TB of memory
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory
On 3/16/06, Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
products/tera-ramsan/
Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :)
Pricing is tight-lipped, but
Jim,
PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
products/tera-ramsan/
With a single 3 Gbyte/second infiniband connection to the device?
You'd be better off with 4 x $10K servers that do 800MB/s from disk
Jim,
On 3/16/06 10:44 PM, Luke Lonergan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plus - need more speed? Add 12 more servers, and you'd run at 12.8GB/s and
have 96TB of disk to work with, and you'd *still* spend less on HW and SW
than the SSD.
And I forgot to mention that with these 16 servers you'd have
Luke,
With a single 3 Gbyte/second infiniband connection to the device?
Hey, take it easy! Jim's post was tongue-in-cheek.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your
18 matches
Mail list logo
