On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.es wrote:
El Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:04:49 -0500
I've taken down the article and I'll bring up it again when I've
collected new numbers.
Please do, this subject is very interesting.
Regards.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing
El Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:04:49 -0500
Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Denis Lussier
denis.luss...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi all,
As the author of BenchmarkSQL and the founder of EnterpriseDB I
can assure you that BenchmarkSQL was
Hi all,
As the author of BenchmarkSQL and the founder of EnterpriseDB I
can assure you that BenchmarkSQL was NOT written specifically for
PostgreSQL.It is intended to be a completely database agnostic
tpc-c like java based benchmark.
However; as Jonah correctly points out in painstaking
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Denis Lussier
denis.luss...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi all,
As the author of BenchmarkSQL and the founder of EnterpriseDB I
can assure you that BenchmarkSQL was NOT written specifically for
PostgreSQL.It is intended to be a completely database
Hi,
I've made a benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle under three
environments: GNU/Linux-x86, Solaris-x86 (same machine as GNU/Linux) and
Solaris-SPARC. I think you might find it interesting:
On Friday 20 February 2009, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.es wrote:
Hi,
I've made a benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle under three
environments: GNU/Linux-x86, Solaris-x86 (same machine as GNU/Linux) and
Solaris-SPARC. I think you might find it interesting:
El Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:36:44 -0800
Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca escribió:
On Friday 20 February 2009, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.es
wrote:
Hi,
I've made a benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle under
three environments: GNU/Linux-x86, Solaris-x86 (same machine as
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.eswrote:
Hi,
I've made a benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle under three
environments: GNU/Linux-x86, Solaris-x86 (same machine as GNU/Linux) and
Solaris-SPARC. I think you might find it interesting:
El Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:39:41 -0500
Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Sergio Lopez
sergio.lo...@nologin.eswrote:
Hi,
I've made a benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle under
three environments: GNU/Linux-x86, Solaris-x86 (same
First of all, you need to do some research on the benchmark kit itself,
rather than blindly downloading and using one. BenchmarkSQL has significant
bugs in it which affect the result. I can say that authoritatively as I
worked on/with it for quite awhile. Don't trust any result that comes
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.eswrote:
On the other hand, I've neved said that what I've done is the
Perfect-Marvelous-Definitive Benchmark, it's just a personal project,
and I don't have an infinite amount of time to invest on it.
When you make comments
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, you need to do some research on the benchmark kit itself,
rather than blindly downloading and using one. BenchmarkSQL has
significant
bugs in it which affect the result. I can say that authoritatively
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.comwrote:
Having this said, the benchmark is not as unfair as you thought. I've
taken care to prepare all databases to meet similar values for their
cache, buffers and I/O configuration (to what's possible given their
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Sergio Lopez sergio.lo...@nologin.es
wrote:
On the other hand, I've neved said that what I've done is the
Perfect-Marvelous-Definitive Benchmark, it's just a personal project,
and
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM you are the one throwing out unsubstantiated assertions without
data to back it up. OP ran benchmark. showed hardware/configs, and
demonstrated result. He was careful to hedge expectations and gave
rationale for
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM you are the one throwing out unsubstantiated assertions without
data to back it up. OP ran benchmark. showed hardware/configs, and
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM you are the one throwing out unsubstantiated assertions
Robert Haas wrote:
The biggest flaw in the benchmark by far has got to be that it was
done with a ramdisk, so it's really only measuring CPU consumption.
Measuring CPU consumption is interesting, but it doesn't have a lot to
do with throughput in real-life situations.
... and memory
El Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:48:06 -0500
Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Sergio Lopez
sergio.lo...@nologin.eswrote:
Having this said, the benchmark is not as unfair as you thought. I've
taken care to prepare all databases to meet similar values
El Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:54:58 -0500
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jonah H. Harris
jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Merlin Moncure
mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM you are the one throwing out unsubstantiated
20 matches
Mail list logo
