Sami Dalouche wrote:
> -- For some reason, my message doesn't seem to go through the mailing
> list, so I am trying without any attachment
FWIW, you can post EXPLAIN ANALYZE results on the web here:
http://www.explain-analyze.info/
It's a pretty cool utility by Michael Glaesemann that should make
Thanks for your answer.
So, basically, what you are saying is that there is nothing particularly
wrong with the query, nor with its optimization ? So if I need
performance for this query, I should just revert to other techniques
(giving more memory to postgres, caching outside postgres, etc..) ?
Sami Dalouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Compare that to the following query, that is exactly the same except
> that the City table is inner'joined instead of outer joined
> ...
> the explain analyze is available at :
> http://www.photosdesami.com/temp/exp6.txt
AFAICS it's just absolutely blind
Sami Dalouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -- For some reason, my message doesn't seem to go through the mailing
> list, so I am trying without any attachment
Please don't do that, at least not that way. These explain outputs have
been line-wrapped to the point of utter unreadability.
The main
-- For some reason, my message doesn't seem to go through the mailing
list, so I am trying without any attachment
Hi,
Thank you Tom and Dimitri for your precious help.
So, I applied the patch at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00374.php
The good news is that with the
Richard Huxton a écrit :
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 29 octobre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
Is there any chance you can apply the one-line
patch shown here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00374.php
If rebuilding packages is not to your taste, possibly a down-
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 29 octobre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
Is there any chance you can apply the one-line
patch shown here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00374.php
If rebuilding packages is not to your taste, possibly a down-rev to
8.2.4 would be the
Hi,
Le lundi 29 octobre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Is there any chance you can apply the one-line
> patch shown here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00374.php
>
> If rebuilding packages is not to your taste, possibly a down-rev to
> 8.2.4 would be the easiest solution
Sami Dalouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, the version of postgres I use is :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop $ dpkg -l | grep postgres
> ii postgresql-8.2 8.2.5-1.1
OK. I think you have run afoul of a bug that was introduced in 8.2.5
that causes it not to realize
Hi,
Sorry for not giving enough information.. I didn't want to pollute you
with too much detail...
So, the version of postgres I use is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop $ dpkg -l | grep postgres
ii postgresql-8.2 8.2.5-1.1
object-relational SQL database, version 8.2
ii
Sami Dalouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, what could prevent postgrs from using the index ?
You've carefully withheld all the details that might let us guess.
If I had to guess anyway, I'd guess this is a pre-8.2 PG release
that doesn't know how to rearrange outer joins, but there are any
nu
Hi,
I have a query that uses left outer join, and this seems to prevent the
index on the right column to be used.
I couldn't really trim down the query without having the index used
normally..
So, I have the following tables that join :
Offer -> AdCreatedEvent -> Account -> ContactInformation
12 matches
Mail list logo