Re: [PERFORM] Simple database, multiple instances?

2010-11-30 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Mario Splivalo mario.spliv...@megafon.hr writes: I have simple database schema, containing just three tables: samples, drones, drones_history. Now, those tables hold data for the drones for a simulation. Each simulation dataset will grow to around 10 GB in around 6 months. Since the data

Re: [PERFORM] Simple database, multiple instances?

2010-11-30 Thread Mario Splivalo
On 11/30/2010 12:45 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: Mario Splivalomario.spliv...@megafon.hr writes: I have simple database schema, containing just three tables: samples, drones, drones_history. Now, those tables hold data for the drones for a simulation. Each simulation dataset will grow to

Re: [PERFORM] Simple database, multiple instances?

2010-11-30 Thread Maciek Sakrejda
I saw a presentation from Heroku where they discussed using a similar paradigm, and they ran into trouble once they hit a couple thousand databases. If memory serves, this was on an older version of PostgreSQL and may not be relevant with 9.0 (or even 8.4?), but you may want to try to track down

Re: [PERFORM] Simple database, multiple instances?

2010-11-30 Thread Pierre C
Having that many instances is not practical at all, so I'll have as many databases as I have 'realms'. I'll use pg_dump | nc and nc | psql to move databases Mario Then you can use schemas, too, it'll be easier. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list

[PERFORM] Simple database, multiple instances?

2010-11-28 Thread Mario Splivalo
I have simple database schema, containing just three tables: samples, drones, drones_history. Now, those tables hold data for the drones for a simulation. Each simulation dataset will grow to around 10 GB in around 6 months. Since the data is not related in any way I was thinking in