On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:14:09PM -0700, Jan Peterson wrote:
> In my experience, you don't want to store this stuff in the database.
> In general, it will work fine, until you have to VACUUM the
> pg_largeobject table. Unless you have a very powerful I/O subsystem,
> this VACUUM will kill your p
In my experience, you don't want to store this stuff in the database.
In general, it will work fine, until you have to VACUUM the
pg_largeobject table. Unless you have a very powerful I/O subsystem,
this VACUUM will kill your performance.
> You're forgetting about cleanup and transactions. If yo
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:18:49AM -0800, Craig A. James wrote:
> Nate Byrnes wrote:
> >I must claim some ignorance, I come from the application world... but,
> >from a data integrity perspective, it makes a whole lot of sense to
> >store video, images, documents, whatever in the database rather
Thanks, until Postgres can pay my bills (hopefully soon...) I will
have to be an Oracle guy. Aside from the filesystem being better at
managing large files (which I do agree) are there performance
implications for the storage in the DB?
Where I work, the question is not can you add the se
Nate Byrnes wrote:
I must claim some ignorance, I come from the application world... but,
from a data integrity perspective, it makes a whole lot of sense to
store video, images, documents, whatever in the database rather than on
the file system external to it. Personally, I would use LOB's, bu
I must claim some ignorance, I come from the application world... but,
from a data integrity perspective, it makes a whole lot of sense to
store video, images, documents, whatever in the database rather than on
the file system external to it. Personally, I would use LOB's, but I do
not know the
A Dimecres 01 Febrer 2006 01:32, Rodrigo Madera va escriure:
> I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
> a database.
>
> I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
>
> 1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
>
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:32 -0800, Rodrigo Madera wrote:
> I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
> a database.
>
> I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
>
> 1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
> 2)
Rodrigo Madera wrote:
I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
a database.
I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
2) Store each frame in a separate record in the
I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
a database.
I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
2) Store each frame in a separate record in the table "frames".
3) (type
10 matches
Mail list logo
