On Wednesday 29 August 2007, Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are higher end ones that do have ECC RAM (and backup drives and
> stuff) but they're spectacularly more expensive than the cheapo
> consumer ones.
>
Yeah the good ones look more like http://ramsan.com/ .
--
"Pulling tog
In response to Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk.
> >
> > Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller
> > as well? If not, what do people think about writing the transact
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:11:32PM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
> It think the general conclusion was "When they come out with an ECC
> version, we'll look at them."
FWIW, it shouldn't be impossible to implement ECC in software; they'd still
be orders of magnitude faster than normal disks.
/* Stei
On Aug 29, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Mark Mielke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate
disk.
Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed
controller as well? If not, what do people think about writing
the transaction log
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk.
Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller
as well? If not, what do people think about writing the transaction
log to a flash card or the like?
How popular are the batter
For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk.
Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller as well?
If not, what do people think about writing the transaction log to a flash card
or the like?
For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk.
Does
the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller as
well? If not, what do people think about writing the transaction log
to a flash card or the like?
