On 12/1/07, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, the only way to parallelize a query in Postgres is to use
> pgpool-II.
FYI: plproxy issues queries for several nodes in parallel too.
--
marko
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: exp
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> I believe the threads you're talking about were related to scanning,
> not parallel query. Though, when Qingqing and I were discussing
> parallel query a little over a year ago, I do seem to recall several
> uninformed opinions stating that sequential s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
henk de wit wrote:
>> > I wonder whether the current versions of postgres (i.e. either 8.2
> or 8.3)
>> > are able to utilize multiple cores for the execution of a single query?
>> Nope.
>
> I see, thanks for the clarification.
>
> Btw, in this threa
On Dec 1, 2007 9:42 AM, henk de wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't this offer some opportunities for running things on multiple cores?
No, it's not actually parallel in the same sense.
> Yes, I noticed this project before. At the time it was not really clear how
> stable and/or how well su
> > I wonder whether the current versions of postgres (i.e. either 8.2 or 8.3)
> > are able to utilize multiple cores for the execution of a single query?
> Nope.
I see, thanks for the clarification.
Btw, in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-10/msg00159.php
the
On Dec 1, 2007 8:21 AM, henk de wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder whether the current versions of postgres (i.e. either 8.2 or 8.3)
> are able to utilize multiple cores for the execution of a single query?
Nope.
> This is one thing that systems like SQL Server and Oracle have been able to
I wonder whether the current versions of postgres (i.e. either 8.2 or 8.3) are
able to utilize multiple cores for the execution of a single query?
This is one thing that systems like SQL Server and Oracle have been able to do
for quite some time. I haven't seen much in the documentation that hin
