> > It's *got* to be the network configuration on the client machine.
>
> We've seen gripes of this sort before --- check the list archives for
> possible fixes. I seem to recall something about a "QoS patch", as
> well as suggestions to get rid of third-party packages that might be
> interfering
Richard Huxton writes:
> Josep Maria Pinyol Fontseca wrote:
>> Network utilization: 0%
> It's *got* to be the network configuration on the client machine.
We've seen gripes of this sort before --- check the list archives for
possible fixes. I seem to recall something about a "QoS patch", as
wel
Richard Huxton writes:
> Josep Maria Pinyol Fontseca wrote:
> > Windows XP client box with psql version 8.1.1 versus Windows XP server:
> > select * from ; -> 60 seconds aprox. to obtain a results
> > Network utilization: 3%
The 60 seconds sounds suspiciously like a DNS problem.
--
Josep Maria Pinyol Fontseca wrote:
Linux box with psql version 7.2.1 versus Windows XP server:
select * from ; -> 7 seconds aprox. to obtain a results.
Network utilization: 100%
Windows XP client box with psql version 8.1.1 versus Windows XP server:
select * from ; -> 60 seconds aprox. to obt
Hello,
We have the next scenario:
Linux box with postgresql 7.2.1-1 (client)
Windows XP with postgresql 8.1.1 (server)
Windows XP with postgresql 8.1.1 (client)
All connected in 10Mb LAN
In server box, we have a table with 65000 rows and usign "psql" we have
these results:
Linux box with ps
