"Sailer, Denis (YBUSA-CDR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-04/msg00280.php
> The last messages on this subject are from April of 2005. Has there
> been any successful ways to significantly reduce the impact this has to
> multi-processing?
CVS
FWIW, I'm seeing this with a client at the moment. 40-60k CS per second
on Dual 3.2GHz.
There are plenty of other issues we're dealing with, but this is
obviously
disconcerting...
On 19 Jul 2005, at 19:23, Sailer, Denis (YBUSA-CDR) wrote:
The thread below has the test case that we were abl
The thread below has the test case that we were able to use
to reproduce the issue.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-04/msg00280.php
The last messages on this subject are from April of
2005. Has there been any successful ways to significantly reduce the
impact
