I'm just top posting this because this whole thread needs a reset before it
goes any farther.
Start with a real description of these hosts - Number and types of disks,
filesystem configs, processors, memory, OS, etc. If your db is small enough
to fit into RAM, please show us the db config you are
On 07/18/2011 03:56 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Dne 18.7.2011 22:11,k...@rice.edu napsal(a):
In my testing I have a 32bit CentOS on the x3450, but a 64bit CentOS
on the E5335. Can this make such a bit difference or should the
perform fairly close to the same speed? Both servers have 8GB of
RAM, a
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> M. D. wrote:
>>
>> I'm a bit surprised as the x3450 has DDR3, while the E5335 has DDR2, and
>> of course because of the cycle speed difference alone I would think the
>> X3450 should beat the E5335.
>
> Try comparing them with stream-scaling to
M. D. wrote:
I'm a bit surprised as the x3450 has DDR3, while the E5335 has DDR2,
and of course because of the cycle speed difference alone I would
think the X3450 should beat the E5335.
Try comparing them with stream-scaling to see what happens:
https://github.com/gregs1104/stream-scaling
Y
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:56:40PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Dne 18.7.2011 22:11, k...@rice.edu napsal(a):
> >> > In my testing I have a 32bit CentOS on the x3450, but a 64bit CentOS
> >> > on the E5335. Can this make such a bit difference or should the
> >> > perform fairly close to the same s
On 7/18/11 12:48 PM, M. D. wrote:
> I have 2 small servers, one a fairly new server with a x3450 (4-core
> with HT) cpu running at 2.67GHz and an older E5335 (4-core) cpu running
> at 2GHz.
>
> I have been quite surprised how the E5335 compares very closely to the
> x3450, but maybe I have tested
Dne 18.7.2011 22:11, k...@rice.edu napsal(a):
>> > In my testing I have a 32bit CentOS on the x3450, but a 64bit CentOS
>> > on the E5335. Can this make such a bit difference or should the
>> > perform fairly close to the same speed? Both servers have 8GB of
>> > RAM, and the database I tested wi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:48:20PM -0600, M. D. wrote:
> I have 2 small servers, one a fairly new server with a x3450 (4-core
> with HT) cpu running at 2.67GHz and an older E5335 (4-core) cpu
> running at 2GHz.
>
> I have been quite surprised how the E5335 compares very closely to
> the x3450, but
I have 2 small servers, one a fairly new server with a x3450 (4-core
with HT) cpu running at 2.67GHz and an older E5335 (4-core) cpu running
at 2GHz.
I have been quite surprised how the E5335 compares very closely to the
x3450, but maybe I have tested it wrongly.
here's the CPUINFO:
processo
