On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
I will get four 72 GB sas-disks at 15K rpm. Reading the archives
suggest raid 1+0 for optimal read/write performance, but with a solid
raid-controller raid 5 will also perform very well when reading.
If you only have 4 drives, I'd recommend
Hi.
We are using a HP DL 380 G5 with 4 sas-disks at 10K rpm. The
controller is a built in ciss-controller with 256 MB battery-backed
cache. It is partitioned as raid 1+0.
Our queries are mainly selects.
I will get four 72 GB sas-disks at 15K rpm. Reading the archives
suggest raid 1+0 for
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Is the ciss-controller found in HP-servers a better raid-controller
compared to the areca-raid-controller mentioned on this list?
I've had great success with the P600 controller (upgraded to 512MB
bbwc) plugged into an MSA70 with a pile
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Is the ciss-controller found in HP-servers a better raid-controller
compared to the areca-raid-controller mentioned on this list?
If you search the archives for cciss you'll see a few complaints about
this controller not working all that well under
