On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> We got bitten again by what appears to be the same issue I reported
> (perhaps
> poorly) here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170326193344.
> GS31628%40telsasoft.com
>
> We have PG9.6.3 table heirarchies
We got bitten again by what appears to be the same issue I reported (perhaps
poorly) here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170326193344.GS31628%40telsasoft.com
We have PG9.6.3 table heirarchies partitioned by time. Our reports use
subqueries each with their own copies of a range clauses