There are 1.9M rows in ts_defects and indexes on b.ts_id (primary key)
d.ts_biz_event_id and d.ts_occur_date. Both queries below return 0
rows. The 1st runs fast and the 2nd 400x slower. The 2nd query
differs from the 1st only by the addition of limit 1.
Why the big difference in
Brian Cox wrote:
There are 1.9M rows in ts_defects and indexes on b.ts_id (primary key)
d.ts_biz_event_id and d.ts_occur_date. Both queries below return 0
rows. The 1st runs fast and the 2nd 400x slower. The 2nd query
differs from the 1st only by the addition of limit 1.
Why the big
Hi Heikki,
Thanks for your response.
Please run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on both queries, and send back the results.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp]$ PGPASSWORD=quality psql -U admin -d cemdb -h
192.168.1.30 -c 'explain analyze select * from ts_defects d join
ts_biz_events b on b.ts_id = d.ts_biz_event_id
Brian Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on both queries, and send back the results.
[ results... ]
The reason the hash plan is fairly fast is that the hash join code has a
special hack: if it reads the inner relation and finds it contains no
rows, it knows there can be no