We are trying to attack this problem from multiple avenues, thus I'm
starting a separate thread. This is with regard to the problem posted
via thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-04/msg00120.php
One thing we are seeing with this move to the new hardware (and rhas 4)
Geoffrey wrote:
We are trying to attack this problem from multiple avenues, thus I'm
starting a separate thread. This is with regard to the problem posted
via thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-04/msg00120.php
One thing we are seeing with this move to the new
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Geoffrey wrote:
We are trying to attack this problem from multiple avenues, thus I'm
starting a separate thread. This is with regard to the problem posted
via thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-04/msg00120.php
One thing we are seeing