Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
Just for the record - the hardware that was used for the test has the
following parameters:
AMD Opteron 2GHZ
2GB RAM
LSI Logic SCSI
And you ran FreeBSD 4.4 on it right? This may be a source of high cpu
utilization in itself if the box is SMP or dual core, as multi-c
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:30, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
> Thanks for this reply, Ron.
> This is almost what I was looking for.
>
> While the upgrade to the latest version is out of the question (which
> unfortunately for me became the subject of this discussion) still, I was
> looking for the ways
D] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:07 AM
To: Mario Weilguni
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] postgres: 100% CPU utilization
At 04:53 AM 4/23/2007, Mario Weilguni wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
> > 2. What would be t
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I honestly kinda wondered if the original post came out of a time warp,
like some mail relay somewhere held onto it for 4 years or something.
That wouldn't be out of the question if this system is also his mail
server.
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECT
Scott Marlowe wrote:
(snippage) that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on, so you
might as well get retro in your hardware department while you're at it.
Notice he's running FreeBSD 4.4(!), so it could well be a very old
machine...
Cheers
Mark
---(end of b
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 15:00, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > And do you have 32 or 64 Megs of memory in that machine?
> >
> > Cause honestly, that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on,
> > so you
> > might as well get retro in your hardware de
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
And do you have 32 or 64 Megs of memory in that machine?
Cause honestly, that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on,
so you
might as well get retro in your hardware department while you're at
it.
I think you're being too conservati
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 14:29, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m currently dealing with performance issues of postgres and looking
> for some advice.
>
>
>
> Platform
>
> Postgres: 7.0.2
>
> OS: FreeBSD4.4
>
> DB: size - about 50M, most frequently updated tables are of an average
At 04:53 AM 4/23/2007, Mario Weilguni wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
> 2. What would be the recommended set of parameters to tune up in order
> to improve the performance over the time, instead of considering an
> option to vacuum every 30 minutes or so?
>
> 3. I
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
> 2. What would be the recommended set of parameters to tune up in order
> to improve the performance over the time, instead of considering an
> option to vacuum every 30 minutes or so?
>
> 3. Is it safe to run 'vacuum' as frequently as ever
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
I know that 7.0.2 is an old version and therefore ran the same test on
7.3.18 - the performance behavior was similar.
Why have you choosen just another very old version for performance
comparison and not the latest stable release?
Kind regards
"Sergey Tsukinovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently dealing with performance issues of postgres and looking
> for some advice.
> Postgres: 7.0.2
Stop right there. You have *no* business asking for help on an
installation you have not updated in more than six years.
Hi,
I'm currently dealing with performance issues of postgres and looking
for some advice.
Platform
Postgres: 7.0.2
OS: FreeBSD4.4
DB: size - about 50M, most frequently updated tables are of an average
size of 1000-2000 rows and there are not many of them, about 15 in total
Descripti
13 matches
Mail list logo
