Michael Nacos escribió:
> I would be very surprised if logging had a significant overhead any method
> you choose. there's probably something very wrong with your setup if this
> is the case.
Either something very wrong, or the load is extremely high. In the
latter case perhaps it would make sen
we have actually gone the opposite way and switched to using syslog
for logging purposes some time ago, with no performance issues.
syslog files are easily read by a lot of applications out there. We have
been using rsyslog for aggregating logs from multiple servers, splunk
for analysis purposes a
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Ibrahim
Harrani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postgresql 8.3 with FreeBSD. FreeBSD is using syslog by
> default for postgresql logs.
> I would like to disable syslog in postgresql.conf. Does this change
> increase the performance?
> What is the impact of using syslog o
Hi,
I am using postgresql 8.3 with FreeBSD. FreeBSD is using syslog by
default for postgresql logs.
I would like to disable syslog in postgresql.conf. Does this change
increase the performance?
What is the impact of using syslog on postgresql performance?
Thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance m
