[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm doing tests on various Database and in particular I'm running a
comparison between Oracle 10g and Postgres 8.1 on a dedicated server
with 2 processors Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2218 2.6 GHz, 4GB of memory
and Debian GNU / Linux version 2.6.18-5. Performance
On Nov 22, 2007 10:45 AM, Kevin Grittner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest testing with some form of connection pooling.
Yeah, that's one of the reasons I suggested DBT-2. It pools
connections and is the most mature TPC-C-like test for Postgres.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect |
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/22/07 8:09 AM >>>
> Performance is very similar up
> to 30 users, but from 40 onwards with Postgres fall quickly.
I suggest testing with some form of connection pooling.
Many database products will queue requests in those situations;
with PostgreSQL
On Nov 22, 2007 9:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing tests on various Database and in particular I'm running a
> comparison between Oracle 10g and Postgres 8.1 on a dedicated server
As Bill said, do not publish any part of the Oracle result anywhere.
> with 2 processo
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I'm doing tests on various Database and in particular I'm running a
> comparison between Oracle 10g and Postgres 8.1 on a dedicated server
> with 2 processors Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2218 2.6 GHz, 4GB of memory
> and Debian GNU / Lin
Hello all,
I'm doing tests on various Database and in particular I'm running a
comparison between Oracle 10g and Postgres 8.1 on a dedicated server
with 2 processors Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2218 2.6 GHz, 4GB of memory
and Debian GNU / Linux version 2.6.18-5. Performance is very similar up
to 30