RES: [PERFORM] Improving SQL performance

2007-01-12 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
Yes, casting the result improved the time response a lot. Thank you! Reimer > -Mensagem original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Tom Lane > Enviada em: quinta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2007 16:31 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.or

Re: RES: [PERFORM] Improving SQL performance

2007-01-11 Thread Cesar Suga
Hi, Carlos, Wouldn't it be better if you used INT in 'codcep' in both tables (as CEP/ZIP numbers are [0-9]{8})? Casting as Tom Lane suggested is also a good alternative, yet I think it'd be much better if you used int in both columns. Regards, Cesar Let's see the query: SELECT ENDE.* , DEN

RES: [PERFORM] Improving SQL performance

2007-01-11 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
Yes, I do have an index on tt_log.codcep. Indexes I´ve on both tables: tt_end Indexes: "pk_end" PRIMARY KEY, btree (filcli, codcli, codfil, numend) "ak_end_numdoc" UNIQUE, btree (numdoc) "i_fk_end_darc" btree (codarc, tiparc) "i_fk_end_dend" btree (tipend) "i_fk_end_dfil" btre