On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:47 AM, alpesh gajbe wrote:
We have a Proliant DL585 G5 with 16 cores and 32 GB Ram in the terms of
processors we found that buying amd makes much more sense because in the
same price we could put more processors
on the machine
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Benjamin Minshall
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking for your general thoughts on CPU brand and HP disk controllers
> for a PostgreSQL server running Linux. The workload is all over the place
> sometimes OLTP, sometimes huge/long report transactions, sometimes ton
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:47 AM, alpesh gajbe wrote:
> We have a Proliant DL585 G5 with 16 cores and 32 GB Ram in the terms of
> processors we found that buying amd makes much more sense because in the
> same price we could put more processors
> on the machine and utilize the multiple cores effec
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Benjamin Minshall
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking for your general thoughts on CPU brand and HP disk controllers
> for a PostgreSQL server running Linux. The workload is all over the place
> sometimes OLTP, sometimes huge/long report transactions, sometimes ton
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Benjamin Minshall wrote:
I'm basically looking at something in the ProLiant DL380 series which
boils down to Intel Xeon 5500 or AMD Opteron 2600. Are there any
notable performance concerns regarding Postgres on either of these cpus?
The Xeon 5500 series are very impressiv
