On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:57:43AM +0300, Mindaugas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be better
> for our PostgreSQL and Oracle. And especially for Oracle we really need such
> server to squeeze everything from Oracle licenses. Both of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guy Rouillier wrote:
> Mindaugas wrote:
>> Hello,
> Barcelona was just announced yesterday. I wouldn't want to be betting
> my business on it just yet. Plus, AMD usually is able to up the clock on
> their chips pretty well after they've got a few p
Mindaugas wrote:
Hello,
Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be better
for our PostgreSQL and Oracle. And especially for Oracle we really need such
server to squeeze everything from Oracle licenses. Both of the databases handle
OLTP type of the load.
Since w
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Mindaugas wrote:
Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be
better for our PostgreSQL and Oracle.
You're going to have to wait a bit for that. No one has had both to
compare for long enough yet to reach a strong conclusion, and you're
probably
Mindaugas,
The Anandtech results appear to me to support a 2.5 GHz Barcelona
performing better than the available Intel CPUs overall.
If you can wait for the 2.5 GHz AMD parts to come out, they'd be a
better bet IMO especially considering 4 sockets. In fact, have you seen
quad QC Intel benchmark
