On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:25:43 +1100, Pete de Zwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> improvement on I/O compared to the improvement potential of moving to
> SCSI/FCAL, that and getting more memory.
>
I would like to ask the question that continues to loom large over all
DBAs. SCSI, FCAL and SAT
Thanks for the info.
I managed to pull out some archived posts to this list from the PostgreSQL
web site about this issue which have helped a bit.
Unfortunatly, the FS has been chosen before considering the impact of it on
I/O for PostgreSQL. As the Cluster is sitting on it's on 200GB IDE drive
After a long battle with technology, "Pete de Zwart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, an
earthling, wrote:
> Greetings to one and all,
>
> I've been trying to find some information on selecting an optimal
> filesystem setup for a volume that will only contain a PostgreSQL Database
> Cluster under Linux.
