On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> On 22/03/2010 1:04 AM, Dave Crooke wrote:
>>
>> If you are really so desparate to save a couple of GB that you are
>> resorting to -Z9 then I'd suggest using bzip2 instead.
>>
>> bzip is designed for things like installer images where there wi
On 22/03/2010 1:04 AM, Dave Crooke wrote:
If you are really so desparate to save a couple of GB that you are
resorting to -Z9 then I'd suggest using bzip2 instead.
bzip is designed for things like installer images where there will be
massive amounts of downloads, so it uses a ton of cpu during
c
