On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0500, Frank Wiles wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:54:09 +0530
> Ligesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mostly because every situation is different, you may have
> 10 servers and need 10 rows of results, others may need something
> entirely different.
>
N
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0500, Frank Wiles wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:54:09 +0530
> This is typically handled by the application layer, not a standard
> client. Mostly because every situation is different, you may have
> 10 servers and need 10 rows of results, others may need
> Does such a solution exist now. To me this appears to be in entirety
of
> what should constitute a database cluster. Only the search needs to be
> done on all the servers simultaneously at the low level. Once you get
the
> results, the writing can be determined by the upper level logic (which
ca
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:54:09 +0530
Ligesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like to know if the following kind of database client exists:
> I need a 'select' query to be sent to say 10 db servers
> simultaneously in parallel (using threading), the results should be
> re-sorted and return
