o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Kevin
Grittner
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de julio de 2005 14:58
Para: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] join and query planner
Just out of curiosity, does it do any better with the following?
SELECT ...
FROM a
re de Kevin
Grittner
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de julio de 2005 14:58
Para: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] join and query planner
Just out of curiosity, does it do any better with the following?
SELECT ...
FROM a
JOIN b ON (a.key = b.key)
LEF
ttner
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de julio de 2005 14:58
Para: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] join and query planner
Just out of curiosity, does it do any better with the following?
SELECT ...
FROM a
JOIN b ON (a.key = b.key)
LEFT JOI
Just out of curiosity, does it do any better with the following?
SELECT ...
FROM a
JOIN b ON (a.key = b.key)
LEFT JOIN c ON (c.key = a.key)
LEFT JOIN d ON (d.key=a.key)
WHERE (b.column <= 100)
>>> "Dario Pudlo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/06/05 4:54 PM >>>
(first at all,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 18:54:02 -0300,
Dario Pudlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (first at all, sorry for my english)
> Hi.
>- Does "left join" restrict the order in which the planner must join
> tables? I've read about join, but i'm not sure about left join...
The left join operator is not
Dario Pudlo wrote:
> (first at all, sorry for my english)
> Hi.
>- Does "left join" restrict the order in which the planner must join
> tables? I've read about join, but i'm not sure about left join...
>- If so: Can I avoid this behavior? I mean, make the planner resolve the
> query, using
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Dario wrote:
>
> (first at all, sorry for my english)
> Hi.
>- Does "left join" restrict the order in which the planner must join
> tables? I've read about join, but i'm not sure about left join...
Yes. Reordering the outer joins can change the results in some cases which