] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:07 AM
To: Mario Weilguni
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] postgres: 100% CPU utilization
At 04:53 AM 4/23/2007, Mario Weilguni wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
2. What would be the recommended set
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:30, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
Thanks for this reply, Ron.
This is almost what I was looking for.
While the upgrade to the latest version is out of the question (which
unfortunately for me became the subject of this discussion) still, I was
looking for the ways to
Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
Just for the record - the hardware that was used for the test has the
following parameters:
AMD Opteron 2GHZ
2GB RAM
LSI Logic SCSI
And you ran FreeBSD 4.4 on it right? This may be a source of high cpu
utilization in itself if the box is SMP or dual core, as
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
I know that 7.0.2 is an old version and therefore ran the same test on
7.3.18 - the performance behavior was similar.
Why have you choosen just another very old version for performance
comparison and not the latest stable release?
Kind regards
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
2. What would be the recommended set of parameters to tune up in order
to improve the performance over the time, instead of considering an
option to vacuum every 30 minutes or so?
3. Is it safe to run 'vacuum' as frequently as every
At 04:53 AM 4/23/2007, Mario Weilguni wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 schrieb Sergey Tsukinovsky:
2. What would be the recommended set of parameters to tune up in order
to improve the performance over the time, instead of considering an
option to vacuum every 30 minutes or so?
3. Is it
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 14:29, Sergey Tsukinovsky wrote:
Hi,
I’m currently dealing with performance issues of postgres and looking
for some advice.
Platform
Postgres: 7.0.2
OS: FreeBSD4.4
DB: size - about 50M, most frequently updated tables are of an average
size of
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
And do you have 32 or 64 Megs of memory in that machine?
Cause honestly, that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on,
so you
might as well get retro in your hardware department while you're at
it.
I think you're being too
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 15:00, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
And do you have 32 or 64 Megs of memory in that machine?
Cause honestly, that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on,
so you
might as well get retro in your hardware department
Scott Marlowe wrote:
(snippage) that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on, so you
might as well get retro in your hardware department while you're at it.
Notice he's running FreeBSD 4.4(!), so it could well be a very old
machine...
Cheers
Mark
---(end of
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I honestly kinda wondered if the original post came out of a time warp,
like some mail relay somewhere held onto it for 4 years or something.
That wouldn't be out of the question if this system is also his mail
server.
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL
Sergey Tsukinovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm currently dealing with performance issues of postgres and looking
for some advice.
Postgres: 7.0.2
Stop right there. You have *no* business asking for help on an
installation you have not updated in more than six years.
12 matches
Mail list logo
