I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware.
What parameters were used to create the XFS partition in these tests? And,
what optio
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
>> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
>> little bit of volume management:
>>
>> htt
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
> and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
> bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi
> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
> little bit of volume management:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLi
> From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing
> JFS, XFS,
> >> and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware
Mark Wong wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only usefu
