> The execution time has not improved. I am going to increase the
> shared_buffers now keeping the work_mem same.
Have you performed a vacuum analyze?
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
--
Sent via pgsql-perfor
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:00:07 +0100 -n
Claus Guttesen írta:
> > The execution time has not improved. I am going to increase the
> > shared_buffers now keeping the work_mem same.
>
> Have you performed a vacuum analyze?
>
and reindex
--
Üdvözlettel,
Gábriel Ákos
-=E-Mail :akos.gabr...@i-logic.hu|
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> Farhan Husain wrote:
> > The machine postgres is running on has 4 GB of RAM.
>
> In addition to the other suggestions, you should be sure that
> effective_cache_size is set to a reasonable value, which would
> probably be somewhere in
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
> I will second Kevin’s suggestion. Unless you think you will have more
> than a few dozen concurrent queries, start with work_mem around 32MB.
> For the query here, a very large work_mem might help it hash join depending
> on the data... But t
>>> Farhan Husain wrote:
> Thanks a lot Scott! I think that was the problem. I just changed the
> default statistics target to 50 and ran explain. The plan changed
> and I ran explain analyze. Now it takes a fraction of a second!
Yeah, the default of 10 has been too low. In 8.4 it is being rai
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> Can this be set in the postgresql.conf file?
> default_statistics_target = 50
Yep. It will take affect after a reload and after the current
connection has been reset.
If you want to you also set a default for a database or a role. Fine
t
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Farhan Husain wrote:
Thanks a lot Scott! I think that was the problem. I just changed the
default statistics target to 50 and ran explain. The plan changed
and I ran explain analyze. Now it takes a fraction of a second!
Yeah, the default of 10 has been too low. In 8.4 i