In response to Greg Smith :
For details about what the database does there, see Inside the
PostgreSQL Buffer Cache at http://projects.2ndquadrant.com/talks
Nice paper, btw., thanks for that!
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Eliot Gable wrote:
Just curious if this would apply to PostgreSQL:
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1814327
Absolutely, and I said in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-03/msg00272.php
but applied to the Postgres B-tree indexes instead of heaps. It's
Chris Browne wrote:
jgard...@jonathangardner.net jgard...@jonathangardner.net writes:
My question is how can I configure the database to run as quickly as
possible if I don't care about data consistency or durability? That
is, the data is updated so often and it can be reproduced fairly
rapidly
[oops, didn't hit reply to list first time, resending...]
On 6/15/10 9:02 AM, Steve Wampler wrote:
Chris Browne wrote:
jgard...@jonathangardner.net jgard...@jonathangardner.net writes:
My question is how can I configure the database to run as quickly as
possible if I don't care about data
On Jun 15, 8:47 am, Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org wrote:
jgard...@jonathangardner.net jgard...@jonathangardner.net writes:
My question is how can I configure the database to run as quickly as
possible if I don't care about data consistency or durability? That
is, the data is updated so
swamp...@noao.edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?
Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs. Certainly it'll all be
significant to the performance focus.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' ||
Greg Smith wrote:
Eliot Gable wrote:
Just curious if this would apply to PostgreSQL:
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1814327
It's hard to take this seriously at all when it's so ignorant of
actual research in this area. Take a look at
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org wrote:
swamp...@noao.edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?
Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs. Certainly it'll
On 6/15/10 10:37 AM, Chris Browne wrote:
swamp...@noao.edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?
Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs. Certainly it'll all be
significant to the
