Alexandre,
Since you want the fastest speed I would do the 2 data
disks in RAID 0 (striping) not RAID 1 (mirroring).
If you would care about not loosing any transactions
you would keep all 3 disks in RAID 5.
Don't know the answer to the Hyperthreading question.
Why don't you run a test to find out?
Regards,
Nikolaus
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:43:25 -0300 (BRT), alexandre
arruda paes :: aldeia digital wrote:
Hi,
I have this machine with a 10 million records:
* Dual Xeon 2.0 (HyperThreading enabled), 3 7200 SCSI
,
Adaptec 2110S,
RAID 5 - 32k chunk size, 1 GB Ram DDR 266 ECC, RH 8.0
-
2.4.18
The database is mirrored with contrib/dbmirror in a P4
1 Gb Ram + IDE
If a disk failure occurs, I can use the server in the
mirror.
I will format the main server in this weekend and I
have seen in the list
some people that recomends a Software RAID instead HW.
I think too remove the RAID 5 and turn a RAID 1 for
data in 2 HDs.
SO, WAL and swap in the thrid HD.
My questions:
1) I will see best disk performance changing the disk
layout like above
2) HyperThreading really improve a procces basead
program, like postgres
ThankĀ“s for all
Alexandre
---(end of
broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send
an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list
cleanly
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend