Re: [PERFORM] Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

2003-11-23 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
William Yu wrote: My situation is this. We have a semi-production server where we pre-process data and then upload the finished data to our production servers. We need the fastest possible write performance. Having the DB go corrupt due to power loss/OS crash is acceptable because we can alway

Re: [PERFORM] Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

2003-11-23 Thread Joe Conway
William Yu wrote: My situation is this. We have a semi-production server where we pre-process data and then upload the finished data to our production servers. We need the fastest possible write performance. Having the DB go corrupt due to power loss/OS crash is acceptable because we can always

Re: [PERFORM] Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

2003-11-23 Thread Josh Berkus
William, > I already have fsync off. Short of buying more hardware -- which I will > probably do anyways once I figure out whether I need more CPU, memory or > disk -- what else can I do to max out the speed? Operation mix is about > 50% select, 40% insert, 10% update. Disk. Multi-channel RAID

Re: [PERFORM] Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

2003-11-23 Thread Tom Lane
William Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ we don't care about data integrity ] > I already have fsync off. Short of buying more hardware -- which I will > probably do anyways once I figure out whether I need more CPU, memory or > disk -- what else can I do to max out the speed? Operation mix is

[PERFORM] Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

2003-11-23 Thread William Yu
My situation is this. We have a semi-production server where we pre-process data and then upload the finished data to our production servers. We need the fastest possible write performance. Having the DB go corrupt due to power loss/OS crash is acceptable because we can always restore from last