Richard Huxton wrote:
Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
The average context switching for this server as vmstat shows is 1
but when the problem occurs it goes to 25.
I seem to have the same exact behaviour for an OLTP-loaded 8.0.1 server
upgrade from 8.0.1 - the most
* Cosimo Streppone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061114 10:52]:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
The average context switching for this server as vmstat shows is 1
but when the problem occurs it goes to 25.
I seem to have the same exact behaviour for an
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:17:08AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 11/14/06, Cosimo Streppone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say I lowered shared_buffers to 8192, as it was before.
I tried raising it to 16384, but I can't seem to find a relationship
between shared_buffers and performance
On 11/14/06, Cosimo Streppone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say I lowered shared_buffers to 8192, as it was before.
I tried raising it to 16384, but I can't seem to find a relationship
between shared_buffers and performance level for this server.
My findings are pretty much the same here. I
a) order Opterons. That doesn't solve the overload problem as such,
but these pesky cs storms seems to have gone away this way.
I haven't run into context switch storms or similar issues with the new
Intel Woodcrests (yet.. they're still pretty new and not yet under real
production load), has
Merlin wrote:
On 11/14/06, Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:17:08AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 11/14/06, Cosimo Streppone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say I lowered shared_buffers to 8192, as it was before.
I tried raising it to 16384, but I can't
