currently ZFS is only available on Solaris, parts of it have been released
under GPLv2, but it doesn't look like enough of it to be ported to Linux
(enough was released for grub to be able to access it read-only, but not
the full filesystem). there are also patent concerns that are
Guillaume Cottenceau gc 'at' mnc.ch writes:
With that in mind, I've tried to estimate how much benefit would
be brought by running VACUUM FULL, with the output of VACUUM
VERBOSE. However, it seems that for example the removable rows
reported by each VACUUM VERBOSE run is actually reused by
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau gc 'at' mnc.ch writes:
With that in mind, I've tried to estimate how much benefit would
be brought by running VACUUM FULL, with the output of VACUUM
VERBOSE. However, it seems that for example the removable rows
reported by each VACUUM
This should have been asked on the performance list, not filed as a bug.
I doubt anyone will have a complete answer to your question without
EXPLAIN ANALYZE output from the query.
Have you ANALYZE'd the tables recently? Poor statistics is one possible
cause of the issue you are having.
On Fri,
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 23:31, Greg Smith wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
What Debian has done is set up an arrangement that lets you run two (or
more) different PG versions in parallel. Since that's amazingly helpful
during a major-PG-version upgrade, most of the other packagers
