Scott Carey wrote:
On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Matthew Wakeling wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Greg Smith wrote:
In order for a drive to work reliably for database use such
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Agreed, thought I thought the problem was that SSDs lie about their
cache flush like SATA drives do, or is there something I am missing?
There's exactly one case I can find[1] where this century's IDE
drives lied more than any other drive with a cache:
Under 120GB Maxtor
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Rose Zhou r...@anatec.com wrote:
We bought a new WinXP x64 Professional, it has 12GB memory.
I installed postgresql-8.4.1-1-windows version on this PC, also installed
another .Net application which reads in data from a TCP port and
insert/update the database,
Ron Mayer wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Agreed, thought I thought the problem was that SSDs lie about their
cache flush like SATA drives do, or is there something I am missing?
There's exactly one case I can find[1] where this century's IDE
drives lied more than any other drive with a
On 22-2-2010 6:39 Greg Smith wrote:
But the point of this whole testing exercise coming back into vogue
again is that SSDs have returned this negligent behavior to the
mainstream again. See
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=121424 for a discussion
of this in a ZFS context just
