On 03/31/2010 11:11 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:33 PM, raghavendra t
raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome with a
raghavendra t wrote:
1. What are the parameters will effect, when issuing the REINDEX command
2. Best possible way to increase the spead of the REINDEX
If you haven't done the usual general tuning on your server, that might
help. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu
You might need to create some indices, too.
Ok. To what purpose? This query picks up everything from the
tables and the planner does
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a
maintenance measure with 8.3.7 on FreeBSD.
Sometimes it's better to have indexes with some space in them so every
insert doesn't hit a full index page and triggers a page split to make
some space.
Of course if the index is
Hi All,
System Config
-
CPU - Intel® Xenon® CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
Steve:
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a maintenance
measure with 8.3.7 on FreeBSD.
My question is something like Steve's, why
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:17 +0530, raghavendra t wrote:
Hi All,
System Config
-
CPU - Intel® Xenon® CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
Steve:
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
System Config
-
CPU - Intel* Xenon* CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
The disk system matters a lot, too. How many drives do you have in
what RAID configuration(s)?
My question is
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
Looking at this more closely, idlink_id and anno_id are primary keys, so
already have indexes on them, so my understanding (from the docs) is there
is no purpose in creating them. That's why I removed the indexes that
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for the comment.
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Eliot Gable wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
Looking at this more closely, idlink_id and anno_id are primary keys, so
already have indexes on them, so my understanding (from the docs) is
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
I had set the foreign keys in question (on the geno table) to be primary
keys. This is because this setup is basically a glorified spreadsheet, and I
don't want more than one cell corresponding to a particular tuple of
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
I had set the foreign keys in question (on the geno table) to be
primary keys. This is because this setup is basically a glorified
spreadsheet, and I don't want more than one
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
So, should I add indexes on the individual foreign key cols idlink_id
and anno_id after all?
I doubt that would help.
You're sure of this?
It is always best to test and be certain.
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Eliot Gable wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
So, should I add indexes on the individual foreign key cols
idlink_id
and anno_id after all?
I doubt that would help.
You're
On Mar 31, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Scott Carey sc...@richrelevance.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
Dont VACUUM FULL, its not helping you, and is being removed in newer
versions.
Off topic: How is that going to
Scott Carey sc...@richrelevance.com writes:
Still off topic:
Will CLUSTER/VF respect FILLFACTOR in 9.0?
As far as I can tell in 8.4, it does not.
Works for me, in both branches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Scott Carey sc...@richrelevance.com writes:
Still off topic:
Will CLUSTER/VF respect FILLFACTOR in 9.0?
As far as I can tell in 8.4, it does not.
Works for me, in both branches.
I stand corrected. I must have done something wrong in my
16 matches
Mail list logo
