I have two tables in Postgres 9.2 on a Linux server with 8GB of RAM. The
first table has 60 million records:
CREATE TABLE table1
(
id integer,
update date,
company character(35),
address character(35),
city character(20),
state character(2),
zip character(9),
phone character(10),
But, I do have an index on Table1 on the state field which is in my group
by condition:
CREATE INDEX statidx2
ON table1
USING btree
(state COLLATE pg_catalog.default );
I have vacuumed the table too.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/22/2013
Hi,
there is something mixed..
your index is on table1
Explain Analyze reports about table called: busbase
Kind Regards,
Misa
2013/3/22 Cindy Makarowsky cindymakarow...@gmail.com
But, I do have an index on Table1 on the state field which is in my group
by condition:
CREATE
I changed the name of the table for the post but forgot to change it in the
results of the explain. Table1 is busbase.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Misa Simic misa.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
there is something mixed..
your index is on table1
Explain Analyze reports about table
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
We should do this automatically. Or am I missing something?
Yes. This is not equality.
ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY integer_ops USING btree ADD
OPERATOR 3 @ (int4, int4range),
FUNCTION 1 btint4rangecmp(int4, int4range);
That will break
