Hi,
thanks for your time and answer. Not treating IS NULL as equality
operator definitely helps me to make more sense out of previous
explains.
--
Best Regard,
Artūras Lapinskas
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:23:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
=?utf-8?Q?Art=C5=ABras?= Lapinskas
On 11/07/2014 12:06 AM, Vlad Arkhipov wrote:
It was just a minimal example. The real query looks like this.
select *
from commons.financial_documents fd
where fd.creation_time '2011-11-07 10:39:07.285022+08'
or (fd.creation_time = '2011-11-07 10:39:07.285022+08' and
Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date. It's been on my TODO list, as
I'm sure it has been on Greg's.
Yeah. And unfortunately the recommendations it gives have been spreading. Take
a look at the online version:
http://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/
I entered a pretty typical 92GB system, and it
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 11/07/2014 12:06 AM, Vlad Arkhipov wrote:
I need to rewrite it in the way below to make Postgres use the index.
select *
from commons.financial_documents fd
where fd.creation_time = '2011-11-07 10:39:07.285022+08'
and (
fd.creation_time
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com writes:
On the other hand, why not simply write it as?:
select *
from commons.financial_documents fd
where (fd.creation_time, fd.financial_document_id)
('2011-11-07 10:39:07.285022+08', 100)
order by fd.creation_time desc
limit 200
That's
Kevin Grittner-5 wrote
Andrew Dunstan lt;
andrew@
gt; wrote:
On 11/07/2014 12:06 AM, Vlad Arkhipov wrote:
I need to rewrite it in the way below to make Postgres use the index.
select *
from commons.financial_documents fd
where fd.creation_time = '2011-11-07 10:39:07.285022+08'
and (
