On 14/03/15 13:12, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 14.3.2015 00:28, Vivekanand Joshi wrote:
Hi Guys,
So here is the full information attached as well as in the link
provided below:
http://pgsql.privatepaste.com/41207bea45
I can provide new information as well.
Thanks.
We still don't have EXPLAIN
Hi Gavin,
Vivekanand is his first mail itself mentioned the below configuration
of postgresql.conf. It looks good enough to me.
Total Memory : 8 GB
shared_buffers = 2GB
work_mem = 64MB
maintenance_work_mem = 700MB
effective_cache_size = 4GB
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Gavin Flower
On 15/03/15 10:23, Varadharajan Mukundan wrote:
Hi Gavin,
Vivekanand is his first mail itself mentioned the below configuration
of postgresql.conf. It looks good enough to me.
Total Memory : 8 GB
shared_buffers = 2GB
work_mem = 64MB
maintenance_work_mem = 700MB
effective_cache_size = 4GB
Hi Mel,
I don't have any experience in NetApp storage systems, but if
compression / deduplication is the only point for which you're
consider NetApp, then do consider FS like ZFS or btrfs which can do
deduplication as well as compression on normal disks. Here are few
reports of running Postgres
