On 07 Jul 2015, at 22:52, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Graeme B. Bell graeme.b...@nibio.no wrote:
Hi Merlin,
Long story short - thanks for the reply, but you're not measuring anything
about the parallelism of code running in a pl/pgsql
On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
that put some chemistry calculations into Postgres as extensions (things
like, calculate the molecular weight of this molecule). As SQL
functions, the whole thing bogged
On 2015-07-08 11:13:04 +, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
I'm guessing you are maybe pressed for time at the moment because I
already clearly included this on the last email, as well as the links
to the alternative benchmarks with the same problem I referred to on
both of my last emails which are
Hello,
From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Mike Broers
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Juli 2015 18:28
To: Tom Lane
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] wildcard text filter switched to boolean column,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James cja...@emolecules.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
that put some
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
that put some chemistry calculations into Postgres as extensions (things
like, calculate the
On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:
I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
instance of the function being executed and that in turn will use
all CPUs up to the max available resource.
With
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:
I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
instance of the function being executed
On 2015-07-08 13:46:53 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James cja...@emolecules.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each instance
of the function
and...@anarazel.de (Andres Freund) writes:
On 2015-07-08 15:38:24 -0700, Craig James wrote:
From my admittedly naive point of view, it's hard to see why any of this
matters. I have functions that do purely CPU-intensive mathematical
calculations ... you could imagine something like is_prime(N)
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-08 13:46:53 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James cja...@emolecules.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
Using Apache
On 2015-07-08 15:38:24 -0700, Craig James wrote:
From my admittedly naive point of view, it's hard to see why any of this
matters. I have functions that do purely CPU-intensive mathematical
calculations ... you could imagine something like is_prime(N) that
determines if N is a prime number. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
