On 9/12/05, Christopher Petrilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Use 8.1 and strongly look at Bizgres. The data partitioning is critical.
I started looking closer at my options for partitioning (inheritance,
union all), and at Bizgres today. Bizgres partitioning appears to be
basically the same kind
I'm in the process of developing an application which uses PostgreSQL
for data storage. Our database traffic is very atypical, and as a
result it has been rather challenging to figure out how to best tune
PostgreSQL on what development hardware we have, as well as to figure
out exactly what we
On 9/12/05, PFC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I haven't provided a whole lot of application-level detail here,You did !What about :- using COPY instead of INSERT ?(should
be easy to do from the aggregators)
Possibly, although it would kill the current design of returning the
database
On 12 Sep 2005 23:07:49 -0400, Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WAL parameters like commit_delay and commit_siblings are a bit of amystery. Nobody has done any extensive testing of them. It would be quite
helpful if you find anything conclusive and post it. It would also besurprising if
On 9/12/05, Christopher Petrilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Tune ext3.The default configuration wrecks high-write situations. Look into data="" for mounting, turning off atime (I hopeyou've done this already) updates, and also modifying the scheduler to
the elevator model.This is poorly
