In this linux mag article (http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7516/1.html)
the author describes a performance problem
brought on by using the noapic boot time kernel option. Has anyone
investigated whether postgres performs better
with/without the noapic option?
--
Sent via pgsql-performance
On Apr 20, 12:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Lazarus) wrote:
I have a table with 2.5 million real[] arrays. (They are points in a
time series.) Given a new array X, I'd like to find, say, the 25
closest to X in some sense--for simplification, let's just say in the
usualvectornorm. Speed is
I was wondering if anyone on the list has a successful installation of
pgmemcache running
that uses LISTEN/NOTIFY to signal a successfully completed transaction,
i.e., to get around the fact
that TRIGGERS are transaction unaware. Or perhaps any other
information regarding a successful
deployment
