On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:51:57 +0100, Michael Kleiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Statement st = con.createStatement();
java.sql.Timestamp datum = new java.sql.Timestamp(new
Date().getTime());
Date start = new Date();
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:04:06PM +0800, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
how about using PreparedStatment? that's on the java end.
on the pg end, maybe do a BEGIN before the for loop and
END at the end of the for loop.
You don't even need a BEGIN and END; his code has a setAutoComit(true)
before
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:04:18 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't even need a BEGIN and END; his code has a setAutoComit(true)
before the for loop, which just has to be changed to setAutoCommit(false)
(and add an explicit commit() after the for loop, of course).
amen.
Im PostgreSQL 7.2.2 / Linux 2.4.27 dual-processor Pentium III 900MHz,
we have this table:
create table testtable (id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, coni VARCHAR(255), date
TIMESTAMP, direction VARCHAR(255), partner VARCHAR(255), type VARCHAR(255),
block VARCHAR(255) );
We using Java with JDBC-driver
On Nov 10, 2004, at 8:51 AM, Michael Kleiser wrote:
It is trunning in in 10 Threads. Each thread makes 100 Inserts:
For the 1000 Inserts (10 threads a 100 inserts)
we need 8 seconds.
That's 125 Insets / Seconds.
How could we make it faster ?
Batch the inserts up into a transaction.
So you'd have
couple of things
1) That is a fairly old version of postgres, there are considerable
performance improvements in the last 2 releases since, and even more in
the pending release.
2) If you are going to insert more rows than that, consider dropping the
index before, and recreating after the
: Shane|SkinnyCorp; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PERFORM] How to speed-up inserts with jdbc
[...]
Statement st = con.createStatement();
[...]
st.executeUpdate(insert into
history(uuid,coni,date,direction,partner,type)
values('uuid','content','+datum+','dir
