Marko Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least the --fast-math part causes problems, seeing that PostgreSQL
> actually checks for the __FAST_MATH__ macro to make sure that it isn't
> turned on. There might be other problems with Apple's flags, but I
> think that the __FAST_MATH__ check s
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
> at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
> these have no optimization set:
> freebsd (non-alpha)
I'm wondering what that had in mind:
http://developer.postgresql.or
On 8.10.2003, at 21:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
these have no optimization set:
darwin
Regarding Darwin optimizations, Apple has introduced a "-f
Marko Karppinen writes:
> GCC sets __FAST_MATH__ even if you counter a -ffast-math with the
> negating flags above. This means that it is not currently possible to
> use the -fast flag when compiling PostgreSQL at all. Instead, you have
> to go through all the flags Apple is setting and only pass
Done as you suggested.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, patch attached and applied. It centralizes the optimization
> > defaults into configure.in, rather than having CFLAGS= in the te
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, patch attached and applied. It centralizes the optimization
> defaults into configure.in, rather than having CFLAGS= in the template
> files.
I think there's a problem here:
> + # configure sets CFLAGS to -O2 for gcc, so this is only for non-gcc
>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:31:29PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
> at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
> these have no optimization set:
I think gcc _used_ to generate bad code on SPARC if you s
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 14:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
> >> at least -O on all platforms.
>
> I believe that autoconf will automatically select -O2 (when CFLAGS isn
Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
these have no optimization set:
freebsd (non-alpha)
I'm wondering what that had in mind:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/temp
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
> > at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
> > these have no optimization set:
>
> > freebsd (non-alpha)
>
> I'm wondering what that had
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> ISTM the most legitimate reason for not enabling compilater
> optimizations on a given compiler/OS/architecture combination is might
> cause compiler errors / bad code generation.
>
> Can we get these optimizations enabled in time for the next 7.4 beta? It
12 matches
Mail list logo
