On 09/03/12, Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
r...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
I've taken the liberty of reposting this message as my addendum to a
long thread that I started on the subject of adding a new db server to
our
Is a block size of 4096 a good idea both for the filesystem and
postgresql? The analysis here:
http://www.fuzzy.cz/en/articles/benchmark-results-hdd-read-write-pgbench/
appears to suggest that at least for database block sizes of 4096
read/write performance is much higher than for smaller block
On 10.3.2012 11:51, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Is a block size of 4096 a good idea both for the filesystem and
postgresql? The analysis here:
http://www.fuzzy.cz/en/articles/benchmark-results-hdd-read-write-pgbench/
appears to suggest that at least for database block sizes of 4096
read/write
I've taken the liberty of reposting this message as my addendum to a
long thread that I started on the subject of adding a new db server to
our existing 4-year old workhorse got lost in discussion.
Our workload is several small databases totalling less than 40GB of disk
space. The proposed system
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
r...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
I've taken the liberty of reposting this message as my addendum to a
long thread that I started on the subject of adding a new db server to
our existing 4-year old workhorse got lost in discussion.
Our workload
