Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-04 Thread scott.marlowe
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Christopher Browne wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anjan Dave) writes: I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Bill Moran
Anjan Dave wrote: Hello, I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Paul Thomas
On 03/02/2004 20:58 Anjan Dave wrote: Hello, I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anjan Dave) writes: I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel